Mamzer

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamzer

https://web.archive.org/web/20180826204307/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamzer

A lot of modern Jews follow a similar structure to ultramontane Roman Catholics and Jehovah Witnesses.  There is a Hierarchy with someone on the top telling people what to do and they act like that Hierarchy is God himself.  In the Tanakh there is frequent reference to God saying stuff to Moses or other prophets and it is fundamentally different than the Mishna where I just see a bunch of rules but it does not say God said those rules that I see in the Mishna's own text based on the portions I skimmed.  The Talmuds are structured similar to the Mishna in its major categories and I assume the same about it, except I am less confident about my ability to confirm this for the Babylonian and Palestinian Talmud.  I think these hierarchy structures go against the very principles taught in the Tanakh and the "new testament" and although anarchists do not have a duty to convert people to label themselves as a certain religion they should be informed of religious undue influence enough to persuade people that these religious hierarchy structures i have mentioned are doing undue influence otherwise there is no hope for anarchism as most people are unduly influenced by a religious hierarchy to accept the religion of Statism.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 August 23

 https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-right-to-marry-israeli-style/

https://web.archive.org/web/20180823150700/https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-right-to-marry-israeli-style/

Capitalism and communism

https://antizionistleague.com/scrapbook/philosophy-politics/capitalism-and-communism/

https://web.archive.org/web/20180822172619/https://antizionistleague.com/scrapbook/philosophy-politics/capitalism-and-communism/

Degenerate Culture & the Women’s Question

https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-8/degenerate.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/20180822164230/https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-8/degenerate.htm

Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line

---

Workers Viewpoint Organization

Degenerate Culture & the Women’s Question

First Published: Workers Viewpoint, newspaper, Vol. 1, No. 1, March 1976.
Transcription, Editing and Markup: Paul Saba
Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proofreaders above.

Homosexuality and the vatican an ecumenical affair

https://web.archive.org/web/20180820051834/https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/god-create-homosexuals/

https://web.archive.org/web/20180820051901/https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/anti-pope-francis-homosexual-made-that-way/

https://web.archive.org/web/20180820051923/https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/antipope-francis-appoints-pro-homosexual-activist-and-the-counter-church-expresses-apocalyptic-wonder/

Inside The Vatican's Gay Bathhouse

Eskify

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IdcZNFVp-bY

https://web.archive.org/web/20180820043635/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IdcZNFVp-bY

839 "Those who have not yet received the Gospel are related to the People of God in various ways."³²⁵

The relationship of the Church with the Jewish People. When she delves into her own mystery, the Church, the People of God in the New Covenant, discovers her link with the Jewish People,³²⁶ "the first to hear the Word of God."³²⁷ The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God's revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews "belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ",³²⁸ "for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable."³²⁹

840 And when one considers the future, God's People of the Old Covenant and the new People of God tend towards similar goals: expectation of the coming (or the return) of the Messiah. But one awaits the return of the Messiah who died and rose from the dead and is recognized as Lord and Son of God; the other awaits the coming of a Messiah, whose features remain hidden till the end of time; and the latter waiting is accompanied by the drama of not knowing or of misunderstanding Christ Jesus.

841 The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day."³³⁰

<sup>http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p123a9p3.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/20180820045510/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p123a9p3.htm</sup>


Muslims, like Jews and Christians, see the figure of Abraham as a model of unconditional submission to the decrees of God (Nostra aetate, n. 3). 

http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/audiences/1999/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_05051999.html


^{https://web.archive.org/web/20180820045210/http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/audiences/1999/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_05051999.html}

Of Lesser Age, No Guilt is Incurred"

In modern America, sex between an adult and a child is condemned in proportion to the youth of the child. That is, Americans generally consider sex with a fifteen year old, a twelve year old, a six year old, and a three-year-old on a continuous scale of condemnation. The younger the child, the greater the condemnation.

Talmudic law works on the reverse scale: sex with younger children is less significant than sex with older children. How did this doctrine come about?

Scripture states thus:

22. Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

— Leviticus 18:22 (KJV)

The Old Testament prohibits a man lying with a man; but notice, the Old Testament does not prohibit a man lying with a boy. Thus, the Talmud Sages arrive at their position on pederasty. In the following, bestiality said to be committed "naturally" when a man uses the vaginal passage of the beast, and "unnaturally" when a man uses the anal passage of the beast. The Sages make a similar distinction for the couplings of a woman with a beast.

GEMARA. … Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that. (2) What is the basis of their dispute? — Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty [in that respect]. (3) But Samuel maintains: Scripture writes, [And thou shalt not lie with mankind] as with the lyings of a woman. (4)
 It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; [55a] [he] who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally; or a woman who causes herself to be bestially abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment. (5)

— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 54b - 55a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 371

The translator, Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman, amplifies the text with footnotes. Note particularly footnote 2: "… but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred." See also the final sentence of footnote 5: "… nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner for the adult to be liable." (See Soncino Talmud Glossary for definition of Baraitha.)

2. I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.
3. At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.
4. Lev. XVIII, 22. Thus the point of comparison is the sexual matureness of woman, which is reached at the age of three.
5. (Rashi reads [H] instead of the [H] in our printed texts. A male, aged nine years and a day who commits etc.] There are thus three distinct clauses in this Baraitha. The first — a male aged nine years and a day — refers to the passive subject of pederasty, the punishment being incurred by the adult offender. This must be its meaning — because firstly, the active offender is never explicitly designated as a male, it being understood, just as the Bible states, Thou shalt not lie with mankind, where only the sex of the passive participant is mentioned; and secondly, if the age reference is to the active party, the guilt being incurred by the passive adult party, why single out pederasty: in all crimes of incest, the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at least nine years and a day? Hence the Baraitha supports Rab's contention that nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner for the adult to be liable.

— Rabbi Dr. Freedman

The plain English meaning of the Talmud text is clear, but if there is any doubt, the Soncino scholars put the matter to rest: No guilt is incurred with a boy child younger than nine, even in incest. Thus we see that Orthodox Jewish doctrines concerning homosexuality are not accurately represented by Dr. Laura and other Orthodox spokesmen.

http://comeandhear.com/editor/america_2.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20180820050708/http://comeandhear.com/editor/america_2.html

'They prefer boys in Afghanistan': Dancing bachas recruited for sex (RT Documentary)

RT

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eM-xe6wHjnw

http://web.archive.org/web/20160101000000*/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eM-xe6wHjnw